III
The
primary question to be resolved is how the present world, with its
entrenched pattern of conflict, can change to a world in which
harmony and co-operation will prevail.
World order can be founded only on
an unshakeable consciousness of the oneness of mankind, a spiritual
truth which all the human sciences confirm. Anthropology,
physiology, psychology, recognize only one human species, albeit
infinitely varied in the secondary aspects of life. Recognition of
this truth requires abandonment of prejudice -- prejudice of every
kind -- race, class, colour, creed, nation, sex, degree of material
civilization, everything which enables people to consider themselves
superior to others.
Acceptance of the oneness of mankind
is the first fundamental prerequisite for reorganization and
administration of the world as one country, the home of humankind.
Universal acceptance of this spiritual principle is essential to any
successful attempt to establish world peace. It should therefore be
universally proclaimed, taught in schools, and constantly asserted
in every nation as preparation for the organic change in the
structure of society which it implies.
In the Bahá'í view, recognition of
the oneness of mankind "calls for no less than the
reconstruction and the demilitarization of the whole civilized world
-- a world organically unified in all the essential aspects of its
life, its political machinery, its spiritual aspiration, its trade
and finance, its script and language, and yet infinite in the
diversity of the national characteristics of its federated
units."
Elaborating the implications of this
pivotal principle, Shoghi Effendi, the Guardian of the Bahá'í
Faith, commented in 1931 that: "Far from aiming at the
subversion of the existing foundations of society, it seeks to
broaden its basis, to remold its institutions in a manner consonant
with the needs of an ever-changing world. It can conflict with no
legitimate allegiances, nor can it undermine essential loyalties.
Its purpose is neither to stifle the flame of a sane and intelligent
patriotism in men's hearts, nor to abolish the system of national
autonomy so essential if the evils of excessive centralization are
to be avoided. It does not ignore, nor does it attempt to suppress,
the diversity of ethnical origins, of climate, of history, of
language and tradition, of thought and habit, that differentiate the
peoples and nations of the world. It calls for a wider loyalty, for
a larger aspiration than any that has animated the human race. It
insists upon the subordination of national impulses and interests to
the imperative claims of a unified world. It repudiates excessive
centralization on one hand, and disclaims all attempts at uniformity
on the other. Its watchword is unity in diversity".
The achievement of such ends
requires several stages in the adjustment of national political
attitudes, which now verge on anarchy in the absence of clearly
defined laws or universally accepted and enforceable principles
regulating the relationships between nations. The League of Nations,
the United Nations, and the many organizations and agreements
produced by them have unquestionably been helpful in attenuating
some of the negative effects of international conflicts, but they
have shown themselves incapable of preventing war. Indeed, there
have been scores of wars since the end of the Second World War; many
are yet raging.
The predominant aspects of this
problem had already emerged in the nineteenth century when Bahá'u'lláh
first advanced his proposals for the establishment of world peace.
The principle of collective security was propounded by him in
statements addressed to the rulers of the world. Shoghi Effendi
commented on his meaning: "What else could these weighty words
signify", he wrote, "if they did not point to the
inevitable curtailment of unfettered national sovereignty as an
indispensable preliminary to the formation of the future
Commonwealth of all the nations of the world? Some form of a world
super-state must needs be evolved, in whose favour all the nations
of the world will have willingly ceded every claim to make war,
certain rights to impose taxation and all rights to maintain
armaments, except for purposes of maintaining internal order. |