II
Banning
nuclear weapons, prohibiting the use of poison gases, or outlawing
germ warfare will not remove the root causes of war. However
important such practical measures obviously are as elements of the
peace process, they are in themselves too superficial to exert
enduring influence. Peoples are ingenious enough to invent yet other
forms of warfare, and to use food, raw materials, finance,
industrial power, ideology, and terrorism to subvert one another in
an endless quest for supremacy and dominion. Nor can the present
massive dislocation in the affairs of humanity be resolved through
the settlement of specific conflicts or disagreements among nations.
A genuine universal framework must be adopted.
Certainly, there is no lack of
recognition by national leaders of the world-wide character of the
problem, which is self-evident in the mounting issues that confront
them daily. And there are the accumulating studies and solutions
proposed by many concerned and enlightened groups as well as by
agencies of the United Nations, to remove any possibility of
ignorance as to the challenging requirements to be met. There is,
however, a paralysis of will; and it is this that must be carefully
examined and resolutely dealt with. This paralysis is rooted, as we
have stated, in a deep-seated conviction of the inevitable
quarrelsomeness of mankind, which has led to the reluctance to
entertain the possibility of subordinating national self-interest to
the requirements of world order, and in an unwillingness to face
courageously the far-reaching implications of establishing a united
world authority. It is also traceable to the incapacity of largely
ignorant and subjugated masses to articulate their desire for a new
order in which they can live in peace, harmony and prosperity with
all humanity.
The tentative steps towards world
order, especially since World War II, give hopeful signs. The
increasing tendency of groups of nations to formalize relationships
which enable them to co-operate in matters of mutual interest
suggests that eventually all nations could overcome this paralysis.
The Association of South East Asian Nations, the Caribbean Community
and Common Market, the Central American Common Market, the Council
for Mutual Economic Assistance, the European Communities, the League
of Arab States, the Organization of African Unity, the Organization
of American States, the South Pacific Forum -- all the joint
endeavours represented by such organizations prepare the path to
world order.
The increasing attention being
focused on some of the most deep-rooted problems of the planet is
yet another hopeful sign. Despite the obvious short-comings of the
United Nations, the more than two score declarations and conventions
adopted by that organization, even where governments have not been
enthusiastic in their commitment, have given ordinary people a sense
of a new lease on life. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of
Genocide, and the similar measures concerned with eliminating all
forms of discrimination based on race, sex or religious belief;
upholding the rights of the child; protecting all persons against
being subjected to torture; eradicating hunger and malnutrition;
using scientific and technological progress in the interest of peace
and the benefit of mankind -- all such measures, if courageously
enforced and expanded, will advance the day when the spectre of war
will have lost its power to dominate international relations. There
is no need to stress the significance of the issues addressed by
these declarations and conventions. However, a few such issues,
because of their immediate relevance to establishing world peace,
deserve additional comment.
Racism, one of the most baneful and
persistent evils, is a major barrier to peace. Its practice
perpetrates too outrageous a violation of the dignity of human
beings to be countenanced under any pretext. Racism retards the
unfoldment of the boundless potentialities of its victims, corrupts
its perpetrators, and blights human progress. Recognition of the
oneness of mankind, implemented by appropriate legal measures, must
be universally upheld if this problem is to be overcome.
The inordinate disparity between
rich and poor, a source of acute suffering, keeps the world in a
state of instability, virtually on the brink of war. Few societies
have dealt effectively with this situation. The solution calls for
the combined application of spiritual, moral and practical
approaches. A fresh look at the problem is required, entailing
consultation with experts from a wide spectrum of disciplines,
devoid of economic and ideological polemics, and involving the
people directly affected in the decisions that must urgently be
made. It is an issue that is bound up not only with the necessity
for eliminating extremes of wealth and poverty but also with those
spiritual verities the understanding of which can produce a new
universal attitude. Fostering such an attitude is itself a major
part of the solution.
Unbridled nationalism, as
distinguished from a sane and legitimate patriotism, must give way
to a wider loyalty, to the love of humanity as a whole. Bahá'u'lláh's
statement is: "The earth is but one country, and mankind its
citizens." The concept of world citizenship is a direct result
of the contraction of the world into a single neighbourhood through
scientific advances and of the indisputable interdependence of
nations. Love of all the world's peoples does not exclude love of
one's country. The advantage of the part in a world society is best
served by promoting the advantage of the whole. Current
international activities in various fields which nurture mutual
affection and a sense of solidarity among peoples need greatly to be
increased.
Religious strife, throughout
history, has been the cause of innumerable wars and conflicts, a
major blight to progress, and is increasingly abhorrent to the
people of all faiths and no faith. Followers of all religions must
be willing to face the basic questions which this strife raises, and
to arrive at clear answers. How are the differences between them to
be resolved, both in theory and in practice? The challenge facing
the religious leaders of mankind is to contemplate, with hearts
filled with the spirit of compassion and a desire for truth, the
plight of humanity, and to ask themselves whether they cannot, in
humility before their Almighty Creator, submerge their theological
differences in a great spirit of mutual forbearance that will enable
them to work together for the advancement of human understanding and
peace.
The emancipation of women, the
achievement of full equality between the sexes, is one of the most
important, though less acknowledged prerequisites of peace. The
denial of such equality perpetrates an injustice against one half of
the world's population and promotes in men harmful attitudes and
habits that are carried from the family to the workplace, to
political life, and ultimately to international relations. There are
no grounds, moral, practical, or biological, upon which such denial
can be justified. Only as women are welcomed into full partnership
in all fields of human endeavour will the moral and psychological
climate be created in which international peace can emerge.
The cause of universal education,
which has already enlisted in its service an army of dedicated
people from every faith and nation, deserves the utmost support that
the governments of the world can lend it. For ignorance is
indisputably the principal reason for the decline and fall of
peoples and the perpetuation of prejudice. No nation can achieve
success unless education is accorded all its citizens. Lack of
resources limits the ability of many nations to fulfil this
necessity, imposing a certain ordering of priorities. The
decision-making agencies involved would do well to consider giving
first priority to the education of women and girls, since it is
through educated mothers that the benefits of knowledge can be most
effectively and rapidly diffused throughout society. In keeping with
the requirements of the times, consideration should also be given to
teaching the concept of world citizenship as part of the standard
education of every child.
A fundamental lack of communication
between peoples seriously undermines efforts towards world peace.
Adopting an international auxiliary language would go far to
resolving this problem and necessitates the most urgent attention.
Two points bear emphasizing in all
these issues. One is that the abolition of war is not simply a
matter of signing treaties and protocols; it is a complex task
requiring a new level of commitment to resolving issues not
customarily associated with the pursuit of peace. Based on political
agreements alone, the idea of collective security is a chimera. The
other point is that the primary challenge in dealing with issues of
peace is to raise the context to the level of principle, as distinct
from pure pragmatism. For, in essence, peace stems from an inner
state supported by a spiritual or moral attitude, and it is chiefly
in evoking this attitude that the possibility of enduring solutions
can be found.
There are spiritual principles, or
what some call human values, by which solutions can be found for
every social problem. Any well-intentioned group can in a general
sense devise practical solutions to its problems, but good
intentions and practical knowledge are usually not enough. The
essential merit of spiritual principle is that it not only presents
a perspective which harmonizes with that which is immanent in human
nature, it also induces an attitude, a dynamic, a will, an
aspiration, which facilitate the discovery and implementation of
practical measures. Leaders of governments and all in authority
would be well served in their efforts to solve problems if they
would first seek to identify the principles involved and then be
guided by them. |