I
The
endowments which distinguish the human race from all other forms of
life are summed up in what is known as the human spirit; the mind is
its essential quality. These endowments have enabled humanity to
build civilizations and to prosper materially. But such
accomplishments alone have never satisfied the human spirit, whose
mysterious nature inclines it towards transcendence, a reaching
towards an invisible realm, towards the ultimate reality, that
unknowable essence of essences called God. The religions brought to
mankind by a succession of spiritual luminaries have been the
primary link between humanity and that ultimate reality, and have
galvanized and refined mankind's capacity to achieve spiritual
success together with social progress.
No serious attempt to set human
affairs aright, to achieve world peace, can ignore religion. Man's
perception and practice of it are largely the stuff of history. An
eminent historian described religion as a "faculty of human
nature". That the perversion of this faculty has contributed to
much of the confusion in society and the conflicts in and between
individuals can hardly be denied. But neither can any fair-minded
observer discount the preponderating influence exerted by religion
on the vital expressions of civilization. Furthermore, its
indispensability to social order has repeatedly been demonstrated by
its direct effect on laws and morality.
Writing of religion as a social
force, Bahá'u'lláh said: "Religion is the greatest of all
means for the establishment of order in the world and for the
peaceful contentment of all that dwell therein." Referring to
the eclipse or corruption of religion, he wrote: "Should the
lamp of religion be obscured, chaos and confusion will ensue, and
the lights of fairness, of justice, of tranquillity and peace cease
to shine." In an enumeration of such consequences the Bahá'í
writings point out that the "perversion of human nature, the
degradation of human conduct, the corruption and dissolution of
human institutions, reveal themselves, under such circumstances, in
their worst and most revolting aspects. Human character is debased,
confidence is shaken, the nerves of discipline are relaxed, the
voice of human conscience is stilled, the sense of decency and shame
is obscured, conceptions of duty, of solidarity, of reciprocity and
loyalty are distorted, and the very feeling of peacefulness, of joy
and of hope is gradually extinguished."
If, therefore, humanity has come to
a point of paralyzing conflict it must look to itself, to its own
negligence, to the siren voices to which it has listened, for the
source of the misunderstandings and confusion perpetrated in the
name of religion. Those who have held blindly and selfishly to their
particular orthodoxies, who have imposed on their votaries erroneous
and conflicting interpretations of the pronouncements of the
Prophets of God, bear heavy responsibility for this confusion -- a
confusion compounded by the artificial barriers erected between
faith and reason, science and religion. For from a fair-minded
examination of the actual utterances of the Founders of the great
religions, and of the social milieus in which they were obliged to
carry out their missions, there is nothing to support the
contentions and prejudices deranging the religious communities of
mankind and therefore all human affairs.
The teaching that we should treat
others as we ourselves would wish to be treated, an ethic variously
repeated in all the great religions, lends force to this latter
observation in two particular respects: it sums up the moral
attitude, the peace-inducing aspect, extending through these
religions irrespective of their place or time of origin; it also
signifies an aspect of unity which is their essential virtue, a
virtue mankind in its disjointed view of history has failed to
appreciate.
Had humanity seen the Educators of
its collective childhood in their true character, as agents of one
civilizing process, it would no doubt have reaped incalculably
greater benefits from the cumulative effects of their successive
missions. This, alas, it failed to do.
The resurgence of fanatical
religious fervour occurring in many lands cannot be regarded as more
than a dying convulsion. The very nature of the violent and
disruptive phenomena associated with it testifies to the spiritual
bankruptcy it represents. Indeed, one of the strangest and saddest
features of the current outbreak of religious fanaticism is the
extent to which, in each case, it is undermining not only the
spiritual values which are conducive to the unity of mankind but
also those unique moral victories won by the particular religion it
purports to serve.
However vital a force religion has
been in the history of mankind, and however dramatic the current
resurgence of militant religious fanaticism, religion and religious
institutions have, for many decades, been viewed by increasing
numbers of people as irrelevant to the major concerns of the modern
world. In its place they have turned either to the hedonistic
pursuit of material satisfactions or to the following of man-made
ideologies designed to rescue society from the evident evils under
which it groans. All too many of these ideologies, alas, instead of
embracing the concept of the oneness of mankind and promoting the
increase of concord among different peoples, have tended to deify
the state, to subordinate the rest of mankind to one nation, race or
class, to attempt to suppress all discussion and interchange of
ideas, or to callously abandon starving millions to the operations
of a market system that all too clearly is aggravating the plight of
the majority of mankind, while enabling small sections to live in a
condition of affluence scarcely dreamed of by our forebears.
How tragic is the record of the
substitute faiths that the worldly-wise of our age have created. In
the massive disillusionment of entire populations who have been
taught to worship at their altars can be read history's irreversible
verdict on their value. The fruits these doctrines have produced,
after decades of an increasingly unrestrained exercise of power by
those who owe their ascendancy in human affairs to them, are the
social and economic ills that blight every region of our world in
the closing years of the twentieth century. Underlying all these
outward afflictions is the spiritual damage reflected in the apathy
that has gripped the mass of the peoples of all nations and by the
extinction of hope in the hearts of deprived and anguished millions.
The time has come when those who
preach the dogmas of materialism, whether of the east or the west,
whether of capitalism or socialism, must give account of the moral
stewardship they have presumed to exercise. Where is the "new
world" promised by these ideologies? Where is the international
peace to whose ideals they proclaim their devotion? Where are the
breakthroughs into new realms of cultural achievement produced by
the aggrandizement of this race, of that nation or of a particular
class? Why is the vast majority of the world's peoples sinking ever
deeper into hunger and wretchedness when wealth on a scale undreamed
of by the Pharaohs, the Caesars, or even the imperialist powers of
the nineteenth century is at the disposal of the present arbiters of
human affairs?
Most particularly, it is in the
glorification of material pursuits, at once the progenitor and
common feature of all such ideologies, that we find the roots which
nourish the falsehood that human beings are incorrigibly selfish and
aggressive. It is here that the ground must be cleared for the
building of a new world fit for our descendants.
That materialistic ideals have, in
the light of experience, failed to satisfy the needs of mankind
calls for an honest acknowledgement that a fresh effort must now be
made to find the solutions to the agonizing problems of the planet.
The intolerable conditions pervading society bespeak a common
failure of all, a circumstance which tends to incite rather than
relieve the entrenchment on every side. Clearly, a common remedial
effort is urgently required. It is primarily a matter of attitude.
Will humanity continue in its waywardness, holding to outworn
concepts and unworkable assumptions? Or will its leaders, regardless
of ideology, step forth and, with a resolute will, consult together
in a united search for appropriate solutions?
Those who care for the future of the
human race may well ponder this advice. "If long-cherished
ideals and time-honoured institutions, if certain social assumptions
and religious formulae have ceased to promote the welfare of the
generality of mankind, if they no longer minister to the needs of a
continually evolving humanity, let them be swept away and relegated
to the limbo of obsolescent and forgotten doctrines. Why should
these, in a world subject to the immutable law of change and decay,
be exempt from the deterioration that must needs overtake every
human institution? For legal standards, political and economic
theories are solely designed to safeguard the interests of humanity
as a whole, and not humanity to be crucified for the preservation of
the integrity of any particular law or doctrine." |